This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Chishio Kunrin on 2014 Nov 05, 02:37:56
I just had to force my laptop to shut down because the System was using 100% of Disk and lagging everything horribly.
ONE HUNDRED PERCENT.
The System was using one hundred percent of Disk. Why? Why?!

Quote from: Etherdrone on 2014 Oct 31, 00:44:28
I would say that Dark Souls is a game that is about as difficult as you make it to be. If you are careful, read your surroundings and learn how enemies fight you and strike back accordingly, then you are bound to not have such a hard time when playing it. Try to hardball through the enemies, however, and you'll die like a dog and the game will laugh at you.

Quote from: Chishio Kunrin on 2014 Oct 24, 20:10:56
People are furious with an 11-year-old for hunting a deer. So furious, in fact, that they have threatened him.
For hunting
a deer.
As a southerner who belongs to a family that eats deer for breakfast every Thanksgiving, I find this truly ridiculous and horrible.
I understand that there are people who're against hunting, but
1. Don't go yelling at a child and frightening him for going on a hunting trip.
2. In some places, people have to hunt deer. That's right, I said have to.
I wouldn't expect northerners to understand, but in some areas here in the south, hunting deer is a necessity.
Every deer season, only a certain limited number of hunting permits are given out and those with permits are only allowed to hunt a certain limited number of deer.
You know why we do this?
So the deer population doesn't grow so out of control that it spills over into towns and cities. And believe me, it will. One way or another, people are going to hunt deer in order to keep them from causing problems within towns and cities, so might as well make a sport out of it. Even better if you take it home and eat it. And like I said, you're only allowed to hunt a limited number of deer, which keeps people from overhunting.
So don't act like the only reason we hunt deer is for sick barbaric reasons. And don't scare a poor 11-year-old child for it, either.

They assume we're all prone to wrecking more.
I've actually never seen the ocean before irl.
Quote from: Chishio Kunrin on 2014 Oct 04, 12:46:34
me: I don't like apple pie because I don't like warm fruit.
Quote from: Midnight Breeze on 2014 Sep 23, 23:08:27
Being forced to be evil or sacrifice countless goodies and treasures. Seems in RPGs evil is rewarded at every turn. Being evil will net you some of the most awesome gear and trophies available. Being good gets you...what? A warm fuzzy feeling?
Yes, I'm looking at you Skyrim.Why does the most evil guild, the dark brotherhood, have to have dozens of the best rewards in the game? Feels like I'm selling myself short by doing the noble thing and wiping them out. Heck, some quests cannot be completed at all without committing some unspeakable crime against nature. And for completionists like me, walking away and leaving a quest unfinished is just not an option since it will bug me to death. In the ended up:
Spoiler: showSiding with the cannibals just so I could sacrifice Eola to Boethiah, since she's the only blatantly evil follower in the game. I didn't lose a single wink of sleep for killing Eola, but eating that innocent priest was a big blow to my conscience. For roleplay I used the excuse that my character was being controlled by Namira and couldn't resist her influence.
Quote from: Midnight Breeze on 2014 Sep 24, 18:23:32Spoiler: showPeople who insist on backing into parking spaces. People who insist on holding up traffic for this bizarre little theatrical stunt wear at my sanity like nobodies business. When asked why they insist on doing this they usually reply with "It's so much easier to just pull out of the space."
Well, yeah. I don't dispute for a second that driving forward out of a space is easier than backing out, but that's not what we should be comparing. Either way you have to back either in or out. So we should be comparing the difficulty and time consumption of backing in vs backing out.
Now, for the sake of maintaining my demeanor I'm going to explain this scenario using an analogy that's very near and dear to my heart: an ice cold can of Diet Coke. Imagine cracking open that delicious can of sweet nectar and letting it flow from the small hole in the can into the much larger hole that is your mouth. Easy and satisfying, right? No then - try imagining spitting that mouthful of coke back into the small hole in the can. That was much less easy and much less satisfying, right? Harder to aim, probably some spillage, not very neat. Not to mention you now have a can full of spittle, but I digress...
Where am I going with this? Simple. When you back out of space into the big, open area behind you you are letting your car flow out into the street's wide open mouth. But when you are backing in? You are trying to spit a mouthful of car into that tiny parking space can. It's just not worth it bro. Especially considering that spitting that coke back into the can is probably going to annoy and gross out those who see you doing it. Particularly if they wanted a sip of that coke.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm a reasonable person, and as such I realize there are some times when it would be logical to back in:
- You are loading a bunch of junk into your trunk.
- You are unloading a bunch of junk out of your trunk.
- Redacted
- You are a getaway driver for a robbery. Backing in would certainly be advantageous here, however you may want to consider and change of career.
Now, if none of the above apply to your current situation. Then please save everyone's time and simply pull into the space. The 2 or 3 cars behind you in lot don't want to sit and wait a minute or more while you awkwardly maneuver your car back and forth, back and forth, back and forth...trying to get into that spot backwards.
.........Also, yes, I suck at parallel parking.
QuoteDear Federal Communications Commission:
The D.C. Circuit's decision in the Verizon case dealt a huge blow to the open Internet.
Right now there is no one protecting Internet users from ISPs that block or discriminate against websites, applications or services. Companies like Verizon will now be able to block or slow down any website, application or service they like. And they'll be able to create tiered pricing structures with fast lanes for those who can afford the tolls and slow lanes for everyone else.
It's time for the new FCC leadership to correct the agency's past mistakes and to reassert the agency's clear authority over our nation's communications infrastructure. To preserve the open Internet, the FCC must reclassify broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service.
Use your authority to establish a solid legal footing for the vital policies and protections this court decision threatens.
Quote"Right now there is no one protecting Internet users from ISPs that block or discriminate against websites, applications or services. Companies like Verizon will now be able to block or slow down any website, application or service they like. And they'll be able to create tiered pricing structures with fast lanes for those who can afford the tolls and slow lanes for everyone else"