Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
101
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 20:09:08
Gah, realization just occured! Sponk always seemed to be following Snarf. He couldn't really make decisions for himself and so decided to possibly allow Snarf be the corrupt leader.
Sponk then may be giving himself up to protect who he believes to be the more competent corrupt; Snarf.
Just a suggestion.
And sorry Sponk if we didn't make it enjoyable for you, but you were just so quiet and didn't have opinions of your own.
Sponk then may be giving himself up to protect who he believes to be the more competent corrupt; Snarf.
Just a suggestion.
And sorry Sponk if we didn't make it enjoyable for you, but you were just so quiet and didn't have opinions of your own.
102
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 20:05:28
Well, I suppose we can just vote for Sponk then.
Unvote: Snarf
Vote: Sponk
Unvote: Snarf
Vote: Sponk
103
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 20:01:34
It's come to my attention that Snarf is no longer online. Either he left without saying anything, or he disconnected. Either way, VERY strange timing.
And it would at the same time make sense that Sponk is a corrupt....
Conclusion: I believe then that Snarf and Sponk are both corrupt. Whether or not they're the only 2, I can't be sure.
And it would at the same time make sense that Sponk is a corrupt....
Conclusion: I believe then that Snarf and Sponk are both corrupt. Whether or not they're the only 2, I can't be sure.
104
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 19:53:39
Enough of that, though. It seems like we're getting nowhere.
Instead, let's simply allow the others to make their decisions now, shall we?
That's a little sudden, Sponk.
Okay then, we have three decisions that take priority now:
- Vote Legulus
- Vote Snarf
- Vote Sponk
Take your pick, everyone!
Instead, let's simply allow the others to make their decisions now, shall we?
That's a little sudden, Sponk.
Okay then, we have three decisions that take priority now:
- Vote Legulus
- Vote Snarf
- Vote Sponk
Take your pick, everyone!
105
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 19:45:02
I was referring to this when I said Trege doubted you:
"I've re-read the pages a few times and I vote for Teal.
Reason : I'm suspicious of the evil cackle which although is funny is not the only reason, as snarf seemed to change votes as soon as teal did
the random topic of fries also makes me suspicious why bring up such a topic when they were talking about voting and finally the fact that snarf and teal seem to be teaming up makes me suspicious of them both.
(Corrupted know who they are and who's on their team they can work together to banish people in the day phase then take out another at night, giving them a massive advantage over the innocent. )
In their defense though the day phase 1 is so chaotic that teamed votes are forced sometimes so my suspicion could be spot on or way off."
Looks like someone has either avoided that altogether, or not been paying enough attention, and as such, is not entitled to give out your thoughts about my in-game character ;D
This whole time my tactics have also been rather straightforward. Why then would I want to betray that and suddenly dish out a little more of a complicated move like that?
"I've re-read the pages a few times and I vote for Teal.
Reason : I'm suspicious of the evil cackle which although is funny is not the only reason, as snarf seemed to change votes as soon as teal did
the random topic of fries also makes me suspicious why bring up such a topic when they were talking about voting and finally the fact that snarf and teal seem to be teaming up makes me suspicious of them both.
(Corrupted know who they are and who's on their team they can work together to banish people in the day phase then take out another at night, giving them a massive advantage over the innocent. )
In their defense though the day phase 1 is so chaotic that teamed votes are forced sometimes so my suspicion could be spot on or way off."
Looks like someone has either avoided that altogether, or not been paying enough attention, and as such, is not entitled to give out your thoughts about my in-game character ;D
This whole time my tactics have also been rather straightforward. Why then would I want to betray that and suddenly dish out a little more of a complicated move like that?
106
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 19:39:07Quote from: Eclair on 2012 Aug 02, 19:36:37
So far but what I've seen I gotta vote for you again Legulus
Vote:Legulus
Your so intent on making it seem like your not at fault for anything. You voted for teal, so what a lot of people did, you don't have to try to make it so that you did nothing.
But so far if how you've been 'leading" us, it seems it's only lost our cop and has brought us nowhere.
Long-term advantage, my friend. Long-term advantage. It was an honest mistake to have banished the cop, but really, there was no possible way to know who he was for sure. And again, long-term advantage. It's a rough start, losing 2 innocent, but that happens in most games of this. Now, though, we have more leads
And I have already admitted that it was a mistake to vote for Teal. That is my fault, just as it is everyone else's for voting for him.
107
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 19:33:20
I did not make everyone vote for him. That was everyone else's decision, not mine. As it was the very first day, we didn't have much to go on, but the way Teal backed away from voting for Blaze and instead voting for me, after I unvoted Blaze, that was quite alarming. I was going on that to vote for him. And again, we didn't have much to go on, so analytics would not have done much then.
I didn't say you dropped a vote, I said I did O_O
This whole time, I've been playing leader (and as stated before, I should stop doing that); I've been trying to guide people to the correct decision of voting. I've been playing the whole time, going almost all-in. I did this just the same in the first game, who's to say I couldn't do this this time? And whenever new ideas are introduced, I won't completely deny them, although I may simply disagree. I won't say much that is wrong about their thoughts unless they are putting me in danger, just like you are.
You voted for me day one, I protected you by denying Blaze's suggestion of you being corrupt. I did that because I've had my eye on you. And with the first night phase over, and Trege, the one person who still had doubts about you, was banished. Explain why else he would have been banished.
I was defending myself on the first day, because, well, you simply have to
I didn't just say that you should vote for Teal. No. I instead provided my opinions on Teal, Ozzy, and Blaze.
I didn't say you dropped a vote, I said I did O_O
This whole time, I've been playing leader (and as stated before, I should stop doing that); I've been trying to guide people to the correct decision of voting. I've been playing the whole time, going almost all-in. I did this just the same in the first game, who's to say I couldn't do this this time? And whenever new ideas are introduced, I won't completely deny them, although I may simply disagree. I won't say much that is wrong about their thoughts unless they are putting me in danger, just like you are.
You voted for me day one, I protected you by denying Blaze's suggestion of you being corrupt. I did that because I've had my eye on you. And with the first night phase over, and Trege, the one person who still had doubts about you, was banished. Explain why else he would have been banished.
I was defending myself on the first day, because, well, you simply have to
I didn't just say that you should vote for Teal. No. I instead provided my opinions on Teal, Ozzy, and Blaze.
108
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 19:11:31
I've got the timeline sorted out, bro
I had my vote on Teal before anyone else did *hipster.jpg*
While I am not proud of that decision due to him being the cop, it was everyone else's decision to vote for him as well. And since I voted for him before anyone else did, that means I am exempted from following the flow in order to banish Teal. And now, with all the information we have, I am quite certain you are corrupt.
You voted for me day 1, because of my sudden dropping of my vote on Blaze. Dropping a vote means nothing. Immediately changing a vote to someone else does. I did not do that. And your claiming that I did that to try and find someone's role is only partially true; I am not depending on people to openly say their role. Even if they did, how do we know for sure that they're telling the truth? If I were corrupt I would rather steadily poke at the innocent at my own will and stay low rather than attract attention and dig for who people may be.
I am not lying. Anyone can take a look back through the pages and see that my words are coming from an already intact timeline, while yours are mere hypothesis
Vote: Snarf
My edit in response to Snarf's: To put so much pressure on one person is a natural sign of desperation in itself.
And Teal's behaviour was very suspicious.
I had my vote on Teal before anyone else did *hipster.jpg*
While I am not proud of that decision due to him being the cop, it was everyone else's decision to vote for him as well. And since I voted for him before anyone else did, that means I am exempted from following the flow in order to banish Teal. And now, with all the information we have, I am quite certain you are corrupt.
You voted for me day 1, because of my sudden dropping of my vote on Blaze. Dropping a vote means nothing. Immediately changing a vote to someone else does. I did not do that. And your claiming that I did that to try and find someone's role is only partially true; I am not depending on people to openly say their role. Even if they did, how do we know for sure that they're telling the truth? If I were corrupt I would rather steadily poke at the innocent at my own will and stay low rather than attract attention and dig for who people may be.
I am not lying. Anyone can take a look back through the pages and see that my words are coming from an already intact timeline, while yours are mere hypothesis
Vote: Snarf
My edit in response to Snarf's: To put so much pressure on one person is a natural sign of desperation in itself.
And Teal's behaviour was very suspicious.
109
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 18:44:30
Tiger, what are your thoughts on the Snarf case I brought up?
110
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 17:19:34
I also editted my last post with a final point. So please do look at that. If not, what I editted in was:
"And another point is, Trege was a threat to Snarf. So Snarf would have wanted Trege out to protect himself."
Now we just gotta wait for more thoughts.
"And another point is, Trege was a threat to Snarf. So Snarf would have wanted Trege out to protect himself."
Now we just gotta wait for more thoughts.
111
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 17:14:18
Well, see, this is where voting first day really comes in handy. Trege was taken in the night, and we also know what relations he shared with the other people in the game.
Now let's take a look at things....
Why would Trege have been targetted rather than someone else? Well, later in the day phase, Trege suggested that Teal and Snarf were both suspicious. We know now that Teal was in fact, innocent. But then, what about Snarf....?
Snarf voted for me after Teal voted for me, therefore siding with someone else against me in order to lessen the suspicion on himself. And he was trying pretty desperately to make me seem corrupt. Then, as the suspicion shifted from me to Teal, Snarf changed his vote to Teal as well. What does this mean exactly? He's trying to blend in and pick us apart... as a corrupt.
What do you guys think?
Edit: And another point is, Trege was a threat to Snarf. So Snarf would have wanted Trege out to protect himself.
Now let's take a look at things....
Why would Trege have been targetted rather than someone else? Well, later in the day phase, Trege suggested that Teal and Snarf were both suspicious. We know now that Teal was in fact, innocent. But then, what about Snarf....?
Snarf voted for me after Teal voted for me, therefore siding with someone else against me in order to lessen the suspicion on himself. And he was trying pretty desperately to make me seem corrupt. Then, as the suspicion shifted from me to Teal, Snarf changed his vote to Teal as well. What does this mean exactly? He's trying to blend in and pick us apart... as a corrupt.
What do you guys think?
Edit: And another point is, Trege was a threat to Snarf. So Snarf would have wanted Trege out to protect himself.
112
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 02, 17:04:35
Sorry Teal. You kinda threw us all off 
I'm kinda disappointed Trege was taken, though. He seemed like a good person.
I'm kinda disappointed Trege was taken, though. He seemed like a good person.
113
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 23:24:21
I gotta go now, but seriously. Guys, reconsider. You're all going on either too simple or too far-fetched arguments to vote for me. Teal voted for me because I switched votes; he switched votes too, did he not? And to vote for the person who was siding with him against Blaze, but then carried on....
Snarf is voting for me for reasons way too far-fetched to even be believable. This whole time I've been playing rather simply and leading the group (I really gotta stop doing that; attracts too much attention), and not trying to be too complicated on the others.
Sponk is voting for me because.... well, he's just following along. And what would a corrupt do? Go with the flow and try to eliminate as many as you can.
Eclair voted for me because I'm too agressive. I was agressive last game too, and I was the cop. To go by that logic means she's only voting for me to vote for me.
The evidence stacked against me is much too thin, while the combined evidence I have over Teal and Blaze, while individually small pieces of clues, combined, surpass the evidence against me offered by Snarf and Teal.
Do as you will, though. Good night, all~
Snarf is voting for me for reasons way too far-fetched to even be believable. This whole time I've been playing rather simply and leading the group (I really gotta stop doing that; attracts too much attention), and not trying to be too complicated on the others.
Sponk is voting for me because.... well, he's just following along. And what would a corrupt do? Go with the flow and try to eliminate as many as you can.
Eclair voted for me because I'm too agressive. I was agressive last game too, and I was the cop. To go by that logic means she's only voting for me to vote for me.
The evidence stacked against me is much too thin, while the combined evidence I have over Teal and Blaze, while individually small pieces of clues, combined, surpass the evidence against me offered by Snarf and Teal.
Do as you will, though. Good night, all~
114
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 23:07:15
Now that Pinkie mentioned Blaze, I can say that I have not lost my suspicion towards her. First, there's my initial reason for suspecting her; her immediate retaliation against Teal. Then, there's the fact that when I sided with Teal, pointing out her "flaw", she seemed to have changed her demeanor and way of handling having a vote on her. A forced disguise, if you will. And when I released my pressure on her, she began to side with me, fearing any further attack by myself.
115
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 22:57:10
What about Teal, though? He took advantage of the shift in momentum from Blaze to me, and voted for me. Afterwards, he seemed to only be checking in every now and then, lurking. Then he says that he's not even trying to play. That means he's trying to appear harmless...
Just putting that edit I made to one of my past posts up here, plus some additions I added ^^
Just putting that edit I made to one of my past posts up here, plus some additions I added ^^
116
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 22:46:47
We are not, Lorel.
117
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 22:39:28
I dunno though, Blaze, Snarf seems innocent, although I do dislike him putting so much effort in blaming me....
What about Teal, though? He took advantage of the shift in momentum from Blaze to me, and voted for me. Afterwards, he seemed to only be checking in every now and then, lurking.
What about Teal, though? He took advantage of the shift in momentum from Blaze to me, and voted for me. Afterwards, he seemed to only be checking in every now and then, lurking.
118
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 22:29:49
Or I could be looking for more info to find out who the corrupt are.
119
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 22:13:01
WHY DO I ATTRACT SUSPICION SO MUCH? qq
120
The Retirement Home / Re: Innocent VS. Corrupt - The Forum Game (ROUND 2 IN-PLAY)
2012 Aug 01, 22:09:00
If you were saying that, if I were a corrupt, then I'd be trying to make everyone here look bad, then you're incorrect, Snarf. The way a corrupt would go about things is either try to keep pressure on one person, or shift views to someone who people already have lots of votes on.