Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Repor Fixup

1
Quote from: Vertigo on 2012 Oct 11, 21:56:40
I really want to partake in this but G1 has so many ponies its hard to keep track unlike g4 they have a mane 6.  ^-^
I've noticed. G1 has so many ponies, it just makes your head spin.  ovO But I'm pretty sure that out of all those characters, there's got to be somepony you like.
2
Quote from: Vertigo on 2012 Oct 09, 21:22:55
There eyes look funny.  lol
That's just how Galaxy's eyes look. Almost all the other ponies have normal eyes. I think Galaxy is suppose to be the Twilight Sparkle of generation 1.
3
Hasbro is taking too long to release Season 3 of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, so I decided to take a blast to the past and have a look at their older TV shows. G1 & 3.5 to be exact. And I must say that I am not very disappointed at all with the animations back then. Except Newborn Cuties. that will NEVER be acceptable. And yes, besides Newborn Cuties, I actually liked G3.5 (despite it being so small). The older generations aren't as bad as most bronies make it seem like it is. I especially liked G1, despite only watching a few episodes so far.

That being said, I wanted to ask you all, what ponies from past generations would you like to see in Friendship is Magic? Personally, I'd choose Galaxy!
Spoiler: Galaxy • show
4
Quote from: Julius on 2012 Oct 09, 05:13:44
Quote from: Tiger on 2012 Oct 09, 04:34:04
Hay, we all know Equestria is a world made up by Lauren Faust. There's no way we'd actually get there.


You're wrong, in my opinion anyways.

Please note that english isn't my main language, so what I'm about to say may not sound like I imagine.


You see, as soon as she came up with it, that world became something real. Somewhere, it may exist. I... Man my head hurts just trying to explain this without sounding like a fool. :l




After a quick search, I was able to find what I meant, so here it is.

The Many-worlds interpretation.

Spoiler: show
The many-worlds interpretation is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts the objective reality of the universal wavefunction, but denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse. Many-worlds implies that all possible alternative histories and futures are real, each representing an actual "world" (or "universe"). It is also referred to as MWI, the relative state formulation, the Everett interpretation, the theory of the universal wavefunction, many-universes interpretation, or just many-worlds.

The original relative state formulation is due to Hugh Everett in 1957.[2][3] Later, this formulation was popularized and renamed many-worlds by Bryce Seligman DeWitt in the 1960s and 1970s.[1][4][5][6] The decoherence approaches to interpreting quantum theory have been further explored and developed,[7][8][9] becoming quite popular. MWI is one of many multiverse hypotheses in physics and philosophy. It is currently considered a mainstream interpretation along with the other decoherence interpretations and the Copenhagen interpretation.[10]

Before many-worlds, reality had always been viewed as a single unfolding history. Many-worlds, however, views reality as a many-branched tree, wherein every possible quantum outcome is realised.[11] Many-worlds claims to reconcile the observation of non-deterministic events, such as the random radioactive decay, with the fully deterministic equations of quantum physics.

In many-worlds, the subjective appearance of wavefunction collapse is explained by the mechanism of quantum decoherence, which resolves all of the correlation paradoxes of quantum theory, such as the EPR paradox[12][13] and Schrödinger's cat,[1] since every possible outcome of every event defines or exists in its own "history" or "world". In lay terms, there is a very large--perhaps infinite[14]--number of universes, and everything that could possibly have happened in our past, but did not, has occurred in the past of some other universe or universes.


You can also click the link if you desire to read more into it.

This is also a nice read to go with that: Multiverse.




Back to what I wanted to say, based on that, there is a possibility for that universe to be real. If the humans ever discover a way to travel between all of these possible universes, we could someday reach Equestria, since it could exist in another universe, you know?

Hopefully, it all makes sense with that information I provided. If not, I shall try to explain further. ^-^

Thanks for reading.
That somehow... Makes sense. I don't know how, but it does. Kinda like the episode "Feeling Pinkie Keen".

As for the subject itself, I'd say having a pony in our world is NOT a good idea. If you think about it, the pony would have a harder time living in our world than their own world, even if they DO manage to adjust to it. I agree with Magus. I wouldn't want to bring a pony here, no matter how badly he/she wants to be here. So as exciting as having a pony in the real world would be, I'm gonna have to turn down that offer.  :c
5
Fluttershy is my top favorite, but I'd feel terrible about bringing a sensitive pony like her to a horrible world like ours, so... Maybe Rainbow Dash? o.O
6
MLP: FiM SD Archive / Re: G5 ponies
2012 Oct 05, 01:41:36
Quote from: Lord of Madness on 2012 Oct 04, 21:46:57
I believe it was a pie...

That's one pie I wouldn't mind missing out on.  :]
7
News Archive / Re: The Road to Alpha!
2012 Oct 03, 06:26:41
Quote from: Chishio Kunrin on 2012 Oct 01, 14:35:26
Quote from: TimeRight on 2012 Oct 01, 14:24:13
no I havent logged off i thought the server would shut down and kick me.

Nope, apparently not. Lucky you! :D

Now, rock out to this while you wander Ponyville alone:
Spoiler: show


That is strangely very very fitting.  lol
8
News Archive / Re: Want to play?
2012 Sep 30, 22:04:42
Quote from: Night Glider on 2012 Sep 30, 21:58:13
O:
...
:3
>MFW



EDIT:
My face when: It won't respond on my computer

:c

Well apparently the Cadence server is down... >.< But at least the Cheerilee is still up.
9
News Archive / Re: Want to play?
2012 Sep 30, 21:53:58
Ha ha! Finally! Two servers that shows me mercy! (Cheerilee & Cadence)
10
Banned for banning a poor, defenseless colt for banning a poor, defenseless filly
11
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:25:01
333
I have to go, but I will majorly drop your numbers next time.  ovO
12
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:22:50
331
You may have won the battle, but you have not won the war!  8)
13
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:20:31
329
Come on guys! Where are you?
14
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:19:29
Let's just continue from 329
15
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:18:19
327
16
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:17:48
329
17
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:17:16
329
18
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:16:56
329
19
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:15:44
327
20
The Retirement Home / Re: Colts vs Fillies
2012 Sep 30, 12:14:47
325
You're lucky I don't have much time to play!  >:O